Parks and Recreation: Sweet Sixteen

Alas, I have a small bit of sad news for all us Parks & Rec fans- in two weeks’ time, the show will go on hiatus for five weeks, and return on April 19 for the last four episodes.

I really don’t know if I can survive for five weeks without a visit from my Pawnee friends. It’ll be tough, that’s for sure. Heck, I cried for about an hour and a half after typing the first sentence of this article.

I may or may not have a problem.

So, much like last week’s episode, I found a handful of things in Sweet Sixteen that aren’t really doing it for me. I still laughed a great many belly laughs, and I still enjoyed the episode as a whole, but there are a few cracks that are starting to show in Parks & Rec’s foundation at this point in the season. It’s nothing serious. Just… annoyances. And things that distract me from how much love I normally hold for this show in general.

I’ll get to those elements later, though. Let’s start with a breakdown of what occurred over the course of Sweet Sixteen.

Like the title implies, it’s someone’s sweet sixteen- and the lucky birthday boy is Jerry (as his birthday falls on February 29). Now, even though we’ve seen plenty of Jerry-centric episodes before, it’s an incredibly clever concept to have an episode about Jerry’s birthday where he plays almost no role whatsoever in the actual plot. It’s classic Jerry (I’ve always wanted to use that phrase somewhere). What Sweet Sixteen’s actual A-story focuses on is Leslie’s struggle to work two jobs- one at the Parks Dept. and one on the campaign trail.

It’s a basic, boilerplate sitcom premise, but where Parks & Rec shines is in it’s ability to take a boilerplate premise and rework it into something uniquely clever.

Sadly, Sweet Sixteen never really goes the extra mile. Ron suggests that Leslie takes time off from work, Leslie fights him on it, she tries to plan Jerry’s party and fails spectacularly, and eventually she reconsiders and takes time off. As a vehicle for some great gags (of which there are many), it works perfectly fine, but it’s not at the level of creativity I’ve come to expect from this show.

Still, the jokes are numerous and on point, so I’ve go no complaints there. Ron especially stands out as Leslie’s voice of reason and gets a number of great lines, like the crack about eggs (a quick callback to “all the bacon and eggs you have”) and his anecdote about leather and sheet metal (and the perfect, perfect kicker to that whole story- that it took place while Ron was in middle school). Plus we got an eyeful of Jerry’s back hair, which is both plentiful and upsetting.

Sadly, while Leslie’s A-story saved itself from oblivion with its sheer, overwhelming funniness, the Tom/Ann subplot was more or less a dud.

First, though, let’s give me a round of applause for predicting the “Tann” mashup in last weeks review. Am I some kind of television psychic? Am I secretly moonlighting as a writer for NBC? Are there only so many ways to mash up the names Tom and Ann, with “Anom” being the only (and terrible) other option?

The world may never know.

But this whole relationship just isn’t working for me. The lesson we learned from their story this week was that Tom and Ann aren’t really compatible as a couple, but they can make it work because all their differences seem superficial. I’m not buying it. For the past three weeks we’ve seen these two together plenty of times, but there hasn’t been a single moment where we can feel a real connection between these two. A “spark,” if you will. It still may come in time, though. I have faith in Parks & Rec’s writing staff.

And I have no real problems with the C-story here. Chris and Andy are two characters who aren’t normally paired together, and while Chris’s mopish attitude has gotten a little over-the-top lately, this story was simple, short and sweet. Plus, I am absolutely loving how much screen time Champion has gotten since his introduction.

Think about it. How many shows have there been where a character gets pregnant, has a baby, and lives the exact same life as before while vaguely mentioning that new baby every two or three episodes? Two characters on Parks & Rec bought a dog five episodes ago, and that dog has played a role in every episode since then. That right there is a huge testament to the commitment and the talent Parks & Rec’s writers have for allowing their characters to grow and change.

It’s a beautiful thing. Just like Parks & Rec is. While I may find fault in the show, nothing will ever change it’s warming, glowing, warming glow.

And nothing ever will.

Advertisements

8 responses to “Parks and Recreation: Sweet Sixteen

  1. It’s a shame NBC is keeping Parks and Rec away until spring. The most recent episode wasn’t as great as some of the other Jerry episodes (such as last year’s “Jerry’s Painting” or “Park Safety”) and was a little disappointing on the usual Parks and Rec level, but I still laughed hard.

    On the brighter note, Community will be back soon, so that brings a smile to my face.

    • Oh man Park Safety is one of my favorites.That was the episode that really cemented Parks & Rec in my mind as one of the funniest programs on TV.

      Plus Jerry falling in the creek with the breakfast burrito gets me every time.

      Every. Single. Time.

  2. I’ve been very disappointed with the Tom+Anne story lines lately. I’m not really sure if I expected it to be good or if I’ve assumed it would be a flop from the start but it’s just not working for me. That aside I still think the show is fantastic and there’s almost nothing Ron Swanson can’t save…I’ll be said to see it go away even for just a few weeks.

    • It just doesn’t feel natural to me. It’s like someone said, “hey which two characters haven’t had a relationship in a while? Oh! Tom and Ann! Just cram those two together and see what happens.”

      Still, I’d watch the show every week even if it was just Ron Swanson working with sheet metal for twenty-two minutes straight.

      Hmmm…

      That actually sounds kind of great.

  3. Hey….. I have two nice little (some years old) brit-coms I can recommend to you that will help you get a fix with subversive humour! I’m still sooo behind with Parks and Rec, so I don’t read to much from the actual review because…. you know: SPOILERS! 😉

    The one is “Black Books” featuering the glorious Dylan Moran and the crazyballs Bill Baily sprinkled with a superb wacky Tamsin Greig! I can’t imagine it ever aired in the US as it is quite un-pc. (Alone the cigarettes they smoke per episode!) And even so I may sound like an advertisment at amazon uk you get it for more or less nothing at the moment (they have two editions and one is really cheap! But you would need a multiregion dvd player!) Check them out on youtube. They are the best. For real. On youtube it seems to be incomplete.

    And the other one is the IT-Crowd.

    I make it short this time:

    • I love Black Books! I watched the whole series in one weekend a few years ago and it’s alway stuck with me (especially Bill Bailey- that guy’s hysterical).

      I haven’t seen much of The IT Crowd (a few episodes here and there), but thanks for the recommendation!

  4. uups… I didn’t know it would appear embedded, hope this is ok with you, if not just delete the post!

Like what you read? Leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s