Police, Adjective

So let me begin this review with a question for all those reading this right now:

Why do you go to the movies?

Is it for the spectacle and thrill of what you’re seeing onscreen? Is it solely for entertainment, or would you prefer to leave the theater ready to discuss some issue brought up for debate by the contents of the film? Does it vary from movie to movie?

I ask all this because Police, Adjective, a 2009 Romanian film that was met with enormous amounts of critical acclaim and two awards from the Cannes Film Festival, seems to have me stumped.

On the one hand, the film covers a number of topics, like the ethical choices made in police work, drug legalization, and the power of language, and it delves into some wonderful discussions of these topics.

But, on the other hand, the narrative leaves a whole lot to be desired.

I’ll continue in further detail once you hit “Continue Reading.”

So on the surface, Police, Adjective is an incredibly simple story. Cristi, our protagonist and a Romanian police officer, spends the majority of days doing slow, careful police work to build a case against a young drug dealer. As he gets deeper into the case (albeit not that much deeper, the case itself is pretty straightforward) Cristi starts to struggle with the ethical ramifications of bringing serious, life-ruining charges down on a young man when Cristi himself doesn’t see the selling of drugs (hashish, specifically) as that big of a deal.

Alright. From the way I’ve described this film (for those who haven’t seen it), you can probably guess how the movie plays out. Cristi investigates a lot of seedy drug dens, faces threats from violent dealers, and somehow fights his way through a climax that leaves Cristi feeling relieved/terrible because he didn’t compromise his moral fiber/totally compromised his moral fiber.

Not even close. That fake ending in the last paragraph is cheesy and terrible, yes, but it’s an ending that goes somewhere and has a clearly defined arc for the protagonist. Police, Adjective has a ton of issues rumbling just under the surface of what’s going on in the story, but what’s actually going on in the story is almost nonexistent. The majority of what we see on screen is just Cristi going through the everyday minutiae of police work- filling out paperwork, waiting outside a suspect’s house and hoping to see a new development, or trying to duck his boss.

It’s a novel idea- a police story that conveys what it’s really like to be a police officer and not the glamourous, action packed fantasies we see on TV and in the movies. And the film goes a long way towards making everything seem as realistic as possible- The dialogue is superb and is delivered in a way that feels exactly like average, ordinary conversations between average, ordinary people. The camerawork is almost entirely composed of medium shots with no camera movement whatsoever- the camera will occasionally pan to the left or right to follow an actor in motion, but that’s it. That very (VERY) minimal camera movement almost gives the impression that we’re watching security camera footage- it all combines to create one of the most true-to-life films I’ve ever seen.

But here’s the problem- real life isn’t necessarily interesting. And the vast majority of what we see in Police, Adjective just isn’t interesting. When the philosophical undertones of the movie actually bubble up to the surface (when Cristi and his wife or his boss discuss the meanings of language and life) the film becomes fascinating and often touching, but those moments are rare oases in a desert of monotonous, frustrating nothingness. Most of the film is watching Cristi sit and wait for things to happen. He waits for his drug dealer suspect to leave his house. He waits for his girlfriend to finish listening to music so he can talk to her. He sits and waits for minutes on end to speak with his boss.

It’s one thing to have a movie that moves at a slower pace. It’s another thing entirely to have a movie with a plot and a lead character that go nowhere. And I don’t want to sound like that guy who’s dismissing anything that doesn’t end with a hundred explosions at once. I’m not that guy.Hell, I’m working on a review of Luis Bunuel’s The Exterminating Angel, if you’re thinking of challenging my surrealist art film credibility (sorry- I couldn’t not go there).

But a film needs something. It needs conflict. It needs a character who overcomes some kind of obstacle. Police, Adjective just doesn’t have any of this. And now, if I may circle back to my original point (and who’s gonna stop me? It’s my blog), I worry that I’m missing something that the people who showered this film with praise and awards somehow didn’t miss. Maybe if I knew anything about Romanion history or politics or language.

But I don’t. So I guess I’m stuck with my dislike of Police, Adjective.

I tried. I really, really tried.


14 responses to “Police, Adjective

  1. Great write up.

    I have not heard of this film, and from your review I reckon I might leave it alone. I do like a bit of escapism and this sounds a bit to realistic for me. Although I am interested.

    thanks for the heads up

    • It seems like one of those films that’s insanely polarizing- either you love it or you despise it. Although if you’re looking for escapism, run screaming in the opposite direction.

    • I feel like it’s more for the art film crowd. On the one hand, it’s definitely not a film that’s a vehicle for the visuals, but the idea of philosophy driving the movie rather than story, image, or character feels like something that’s a little less “narrative film” and a little more “art film.”

      I could be wrong, though.

  2. Well written post. Haven’t heard of this movie either. I sometimes go to the movies to escape, and immerse myself in another world. I enjoy watching talented actors, and sit in awe of how movies are made. I also love watching quirky characters and admiring the talented screen writers, and everyone involved in movie making. But I am choosy as to the types of movies I like to watch.

    • You’ve just listed the same reasons I go to the movies- I like the philosophical discussions in Police, Adjective, but the movie really suffers from the lack of what you mentioned.

      Thanks for your post!

  3. Great commentary! Seems from your post that Police, Adjective is exactly what the title says it is. I’m sure your point about it’s boring lack of conflict is right on target but seems to me that that was it’s point. Of course without having seen it I really can’t expound on it much. Really I just felt like there was a link between your points and the title. Cheers!

    • You make a good point- and there’s an actual link to the title and the movie itself- at one point, the chief of police looks up “police” in the dictionary and it’s referred to as “police, adjective.”

      The lack of conflict was definitely done on purpose, but I just can’t see why someone would do that.

  4. Why do I go to the movies? To be entertained, moved, perhaps spellbound. It’s a bonus if a film has a lingering effect that makes you want to ponder or discuss it for hours on end. So like you said, a film definitely a compelling conflict and some sort of escapism from reality and it seems like this one just doesn’t really do the job.

    Y’know that last line is very interesting. There are a few movies that I REALLY tried to like, I even had that thought before I hit PLAY. So when it didn’t, I ended up hating it even more than if I had a neutral expectation about it. One of such movie is Somewhere by Sofia Coppola.

    • I definitely understand that feeling of liking (or even disliking) a movie before it even starts. Sometimes I feel like my preconceived notions about certain films make it impossible to like/dislike a movie- if I figured I’d love it before hand, I’ll love it no matter what the quality of the movie actually is.

      That may just be me being self-conscious, though. Plus, having a blog to spew my thoughts and feelings at always helps to get stuff in the right order.

  5. Wow. I like movies or shows that emphasize in the philosophy, moral value, and/or satire. I wonder how I never heard of this film before. Thanks for the review! 😀

Like what you read? Leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s